Private Eye is blind to Hong Kong’s civilisation

Private Eye is the UK’s best and most popular satirical newspaper, and hence just best newspaper. An equivalent in Hong Kong would be marvellous. (Tell me if you know one!). As it is studiously almost entirely only available in print form, I have it delivered to my tiny letterbox every fortnight. You can borrow my copy after I finish with it, if you like.

It is not perfect, however. Its Nooks and Corners column concerning architecture is, to this layman, extremely conservative and arrogant, rarely liking any new construction that does not genuflect to old buildings and styles. Usually I just skip it.

But I couldn’t skip over this paragraph in Issue 1364 (the 18 April to 1 May 2014 edition), about some proposals to build tall buildings in central London, some with over 20 (!!) storeys, after an inexplicable note that these buildings will be residential rather than commercial:

But are they [the relatively tall buildings] being build in the right places? High buildings, of dubious merit, suddenly seem to be springing up everywhere, subject to little planning control and regardless of any strategic plan for London, threatening to make the banks of the Thames look more like Dubai or Hong Kong than a supposedly civilised European city.

As someone who has never faced anything even approaching verbal abuse in Hong Kong, unlike in London where walking alone at night in many areas is a stupid idea, I’m curious about this racist’s definition of what constitutes “civilisation”.

Posted in Stupidity | 7 Comments

Hearses in Hong Kong: just ugly, or incompatible?

Hong Kong hearseThe hearses in Hong Kong are strikingly ugly. As I live Hung Hom, which is famous for its cluster of flower shops and funeral homes (uncoincidentally), I see these hearses very often, but I am still shocked each time. It looks like the corpse is being taken not a cemetery, but to a rubbish dump. Optimistically, perhaps they are taken instead to a cybernetics-enhancement station designed to make the economy even more pumped-up with regenerated elderly who have been installed with a new brain designed to lead to acceptance and love of manual labour and simple retail service jobs.

For comparison, a typical hearse in England looks like this, sleek and respectful and not going to create a new zombified workforce:

Even the magnificent and magnificently rich Run Run Shaw wasn’t immune from the ugliness of the Hong Kong hearse, as well as the ugliness of the Hong Kong media (long may the latter remain thus!):

Run Run Shaw still interesting while dead

Apparently some locals complain about the presence of the hearses, just because they are ugly, as far as I can tell, with complaints about their air pollution possibly a joke. Funeral homes are “incompatible businesses” according to some Orwellian Forum I’ve never heard of and that I hope doesn’t actually have any power to do anything except pretend it is important. At least they have enough of a sense of humour (or no sense at all?) to proudly call themselves by their acronym “Durf” in the homepage title.

Image | Posted on by | 1 Comment

Frost in Hong Kong, elsewhere

I’m trying something different (how exciting): publishing my fantastically interesting graphs and R code about Hong Kong on, with the help of Rstudio and knitr.

So this post is actually at Go look at it now. Here’s a preview if you’re still not tempted. Now you can go.



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Roast meat, roast foreigner

Roast meat, roast foreigner

Ask your nearest Chinese-reading friend to translate into your favourite language. (Do this even if you can read Chinese, because who wants to explain things to themselves?)

Image | Posted on by | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Margaret Thatcher and Hong Kong

Margaret Thatcher, the former Prime Minister of the UK, and the first female head of government in Europe, has died. Here are some pictures of her in a Hong Kong context:

Margaret Thatcher on a classic Hong Kong tram.

Margaret Thatcher greeted with adulation while on a classic Hong Kong tram.

Less adulation for Maggie at the 1st July 2012 protest

Less adulation for Maggie at the 1st July 2012 protest

There is a lot of anger nowadays over the role of the British government, and Thatcher in particular, for giving China control of Hong Kong and essentially washing their hands of the place. But the historical record is clear that actually Thatcher was against returning all of Hong Kong initially, and only acceded when Deng Xiaoping made it clear he would invade if necessary.

I leave the last word on the Hong Kong perspective to the Big Lychee, who is basically right about her influence and symbolism, and especially why so many are wrong about her.

Update: Oh, new last word: A broadcast interview with Margaret Thatcher about Hong Kong and China. Does anyone know more details about it, such as who is interviewing her and when?

Another update: A transcript of a speech in the House of Lords by Margaret Thatcher given in December 1992, soon after she become a member of that chamber. One depressing quote:

“It is already agreed that half the members of the Legislative Council will be directly elected in the year 2003. That means that there could be universal suffrage by 2007, 10 years after the end of Britain’s responsibility. It is not perfect perhaps, but it is a provision for steady and orderly progress towards full democratic elections.”

Her strong support for democracy and universal suffrage in Hong Kong, including Chris Patten’s attempts to expand the franchise in 1995 against the vehement opposition of the Chinese government and its local lackeys, should give the current pro-“business” anti-democracy forces in Hong Kong much pause.

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The government draws comics

The most interesting form of public transport in Hong Kong, at least to this humble resident, are its minibuses, which were formerly and more evocatively called maxicabs, and are legally called Public Light Buses. Hundreds of thousands of commuters ride them every day, but they are also notorious for their idiosyncratic drivers, some of whom, especially those in charge of the red minibuses at night, drive as though they have a death wish. The supposed undesirability of a death wish in public bus drivers by those boring bureaucrats in their ivory offices and those spineless politicians in the Legislative Council has led to the legislation of the Road Traffic (Amendment) Ordinance 2012. Among other effects, this legally [but not physically, for now] limits their speed at all times to 80 kilometres per hour (just under 50 miles per hour). The ordinance also requires the display of this nannying and ugly notice:


So sad.

I just found out that the Hong Kong government’s Department of Transport publishes a yearly newsletter for those involved in driving and operating the Special Administrative Region’s minibuses. In a sign of the limits of bilingualism here, as well as the undeniable truth that every driver of public transport here that I’ve ever seen is Chinese, the newsletter is only in Chinese. Or, even better, it is written to some extent in Cantonese, and also uses comics to transmit its message of wholesome, healthy minibus driving. Here’s the latest newsletter, and two pages from it (4 and 5, specifically) excerpted for your perverted delectation:

Cantonese talk Cantonese draw

Posted in Politics, Randomess, Transport | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Hong Kong etax fail

etax fail

I want to be a good boy and pay my taxes online, but unfortunately my browser is too up-to-date (and alternately named) for the Hong Kong government to let me do that. That they still require Java to use the etax website is the real scandal here, especially in the light of the US Government’s admission of its insecurity (

Image | Posted on by | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Happy New Protesting Year!

Happy New Protesting Year!

Jackie Chan is absolutely right that Hong Kong has become a “city of protest”, although he hasn’t shown the same enjoyment and enthusiasm for it as his fellow entrepôt-dwellers, preferring to go in for a more Mainstream Mainland-style crushing of dissent, including a quirky bureaucratic element of having “rules to determine what people can protest about and on what issues they can’t protest about”. [The traditional indigenous response to Mr. Chan can be observed here. I can attest this also works with other idiots, including me.]

But hold on, that most mainstream of Mainland websites, Sina Weibo — “the Chinese equivalent of Twitter” as glossophiliacs have it — has been allowing photos from today’s anti-Mainland demonstrations (see screenshot above, which at the time of writing could still be found on Weibo). Is Mr. Chan even more retrograde than previously envisaged? Maybe the Mainland authorities have finally seen the light and stopped censoring online discussion so assiduously… Let’s start this new Gregorian year on that quixotic note.

Image | Posted on by | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Altered Chinese propaganda poster

Altered Chinese propaganda poster

This jolted me awake! I found the above doctored version of a classic Chinese one-child policy poster at a somewhat unhinged conservative blog (which itself was personally discovered via the libertarian blog

For people who aren’t sure, and based on my experience while visiting the UK that’s plenty of people: Hong Kong does not implement the one-child policy.

Image | Posted on by | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A partial guide to British Trains for Dummies, Tourists and Ordinary Human Beings


Dear visitors to Britain or Planet Earth,

Welcome to our beautiful country/planet! We hope you enjoy your stay. We are happy to serve you dead animals soaked in oil and heated until crisp, accompanied by boiled vegetable matter and tubers.

We understand that you want to travel around our island by train. The UK was a pioneer of train travel a century or so ago, to the extent that train speeds here have not increased since then. We are not sure if we should be proud of this fact…

Based on your humble blogger’s experience this morning, let me pass on two tips for how to make your train journey a relatively painless experience… because just buying a ticket and getting on the train isn’t enough in this great nation.

1) If you don’t want to spend hundreds of pounds on a return ticket just because you were naive enough to think you should buy it immediately before your journey, you need to buy it in advance. You will have to specify exactly which trains you will take, but you are probably willing to commit to that. Just don’t forget to bring all the documents and bumf you will be handed, because goodness forfend that a ticket would be enough; no, that would be far too simple, as two young ladies found out yesterday morning. One set of paper will say you bought a journey between two specific stations, you understand, while the other will say which train you are entitled to be on. Or something like that. Having one document without the other, or only with goddamn confirmation of your booking, is not good enough, and you will have to buy another ticket for your oversight.

2) If you don’t book your journey in advance, at least don’t be so foolish as to just buy a ticket between the origin and destination. It is often cheaper, obviously, to split your booking at an intermediate station, even though you will make an identical trip and not get off there.

For example, I went yesterday from my delightful and misnamed hometown of Blackwater to Coventry, and returning today. (This last is an important detail, as returning on the same day is cheaper, and it’s only because I knew this that I could point out to the confused train guard that he was selling me the wrong ticket, which of course by common courtesy I would be fully liable for.) Buying an off-peak return ticket between the two would cost a suspiciously exact £50. (A peak return would cost over £90). However, one of the journey’s stops is at Banbury. Duly rephrasing my order as two off-peak returns, one from Blackwater to Banbury, and another from Banbury to Coventry, resulted in a price of £43.40, without any change in my itinerary whatsoever.

Consider it one of those cute, quaint features of England that make it so attractive to visitors and residents alike, and is totally unrelated to the terrible state of the economy.

So once more, welcome! We will gladly take your money, but please don’t try and make any money back by staying and immigrating. That would just be rude…

Posted in Stupidity | Tagged , , | Leave a comment